liberty
01-13 05:53 PM
I have not got any update from expert. Could you please take a look?
wallpaper hater quotes and sayings for
pani_6
07-02 12:11 AM
Are you emrolled in Emba in Berkely..the cost seems rather high for most mba's 80 K average
Blog Feeds
06-24 01:10 AM
Markos Moulitsas, the prominent left of center blogger, writes in the Hill:Once promising, the GOP�s designs on the Golden State governor�s mansion and Sen. Barbara Boxer�s seat are now running aground on a serious, self-imposed obstacle � the months of anti-immigrant rhetoric voiced by their candidates in this immigrant-rich state. Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman began the campaign as an immigration moderate, but veered to the right in order to win her party's nomination. �Let me be very clear: I am 100 percent against amnesty, no exceptions,� she said. �[U]ntil we actually do secure the border and actually stop illegal...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/kos-immigration-positions-will-cost-california-senate-and-governor-races.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/kos-immigration-positions-will-cost-california-senate-and-governor-races.html)
2011 hater quotes and sayings for
ssksubash
05-04 12:32 PM
Thank you
more...
pkuttu
01-07 07:51 PM
Hi,
I need some advice on what are my options.
I have been working with a consulting company since June 2006. I have an approved Perm and approved 140 with the same company.
Before my Perm and 140 were approved we got my H1-b extended till September 2011.
I am planning to visit my home country and need to attend for Visa stamping. I have booked my tickets too.
The problem is my company has recently changed its location and I have the old address on my paperwork (I-797, LCA etc)
But the latest pay stubs have the new Address.
Will I have any problems when I attend for Visa stamping?
Do we need to apply for the ammendment? In that case should I postpone my trip, get the paperwork and then go for stamping?
Thanks and Regards
I need some advice on what are my options.
I have been working with a consulting company since June 2006. I have an approved Perm and approved 140 with the same company.
Before my Perm and 140 were approved we got my H1-b extended till September 2011.
I am planning to visit my home country and need to attend for Visa stamping. I have booked my tickets too.
The problem is my company has recently changed its location and I have the old address on my paperwork (I-797, LCA etc)
But the latest pay stubs have the new Address.
Will I have any problems when I attend for Visa stamping?
Do we need to apply for the ammendment? In that case should I postpone my trip, get the paperwork and then go for stamping?
Thanks and Regards
div_bell_2003
07-07 06:40 PM
You are only counted against the quota once for a 6 year period , so I believe, she won't come under the quota , although it's getting harder to get H1B extensions every day
more...
shreekhand
07-05 10:21 AM
Please see http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=99690&postcount=29
and that thread to get a better idea.
Even though you know someone from 2005 whose background checks were completed, know that there are several thousand more from 2001-2004 in line before 2005 !
and that thread to get a better idea.
Even though you know someone from 2005 whose background checks were completed, know that there are several thousand more from 2001-2004 in line before 2005 !
2010 hot hater quotes and sayings for quotes and sayings about haters. quotes and
newuser
09-02 02:44 PM
Would like to see how many are still pending under EB2 before 2005. Please take the poll.
more...
Meghna
06-25 02:55 PM
yes it is true
Once the PDs are current I485 is thru RD
Once the PDs are current I485 is thru RD
hair sayings about haters. lil
kedrex
07-18 10:47 AM
From Greg Siskind's blog:
In its press release, USCIS did not state how cases filed and rejected on the 2nd are to be handled other than to say that properly filed applications would be accepted. This presumably covers the many cases filed after the second that were held, but it doesn�t explain what will happen to the cases received earlier. We hope USCIS will issue special instructions to issue July 2nd receipt dates to those who are able to document they attempted to file. We presume some folks are still waiting on their July 2nd cases to be returned and are debating refiling new cases rather than waiting. Unfortunately, there is a risk of not getting the package back before August 17th and some people will need to refile without proof of the earlier filing. Hopefully, again, USCIS will institute a process for such individuals to avoid being penalized.
In its press release, USCIS did not state how cases filed and rejected on the 2nd are to be handled other than to say that properly filed applications would be accepted. This presumably covers the many cases filed after the second that were held, but it doesn�t explain what will happen to the cases received earlier. We hope USCIS will issue special instructions to issue July 2nd receipt dates to those who are able to document they attempted to file. We presume some folks are still waiting on their July 2nd cases to be returned and are debating refiling new cases rather than waiting. Unfortunately, there is a risk of not getting the package back before August 17th and some people will need to refile without proof of the earlier filing. Hopefully, again, USCIS will institute a process for such individuals to avoid being penalized.
more...
gchopes
07-25 09:23 AM
Hi gurus,
Effective Jul 30, 2007 USCIS direct filing address for 485 is given below -
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=eb7b5cdc2c463110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=fe529c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
My lawyer plans to follow these directions (for mailing the package today) and use the address -
USCIS
Texas Service Center
P.O. Box 851804
Mesquite, TX 75185-1804
as I am resident in NC.
Do I have my address correct for 485 filing?
gchopes
Effective Jul 30, 2007 USCIS direct filing address for 485 is given below -
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=eb7b5cdc2c463110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=fe529c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
My lawyer plans to follow these directions (for mailing the package today) and use the address -
USCIS
Texas Service Center
P.O. Box 851804
Mesquite, TX 75185-1804
as I am resident in NC.
Do I have my address correct for 485 filing?
gchopes
hot and sayings about haters.
Ranjeeth
06-21 01:00 AM
The USCIS announced on June 1, 2006 that the regular H-1 cap for Fiscal Year 2007 (FY2007) was reached on May 26, 2006. Those cases properly filed with the USCIS before the 26th are safe, with respect to the cap, as there are enough cap numbers for these cases. Cases that reached the USCIS on May 26th are in an uncertain situation and will be subject to a random selection process, as there are enough numbers for some, but not all of the May 26th cases. Any regular cap-subject cases received after May 26th will be rejected entirely.This information does NOT impact advanced degree cases, for which cap numbers are still available.
Further details visit: ___deleted___
Further details visit: ___deleted___
more...
house quotes and sayings about haters. quotes
Blog Feeds
07-30 06:30 PM
Amid all the pre-election hurling this week of vituperative, partisan accusations over a Federal Court's partial injunction against AZ SB 1070 (Arizona's foray into federal immigration enforcement), you would be forgiven if you overlooked two small but significant creatures in the immigration ecosystem. A pair of remedial immigration bills, passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, await a vote in the Senate. Their significance is not merely because they are examples of a rara avis -- that nearly extinct form of billmaking distinctive for its bipartisan features. Nor are they significant for the hopeful promise suggested by their titles -- The...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/07/my-entry-2.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/07/my-entry-2.html)
tattoo hater quotes and sayings,
beautifulMind
06-26 10:29 AM
Anyone?
more...
pictures and sayings for haters.
1528boyz
08-19 12:45 AM
Hi There,
I need some advice on my current situation.I am in the 4th year of my H1-B .I have my
I-140 approved from my current employer with PD of Aug'09.
I am planning to change my job, my concern is :
Assuming that my current employer do not revoke/recall my I-140
1. Do i need to have the same job responsibilities in my new job to transfer my PD?
2. Do i have to stick with my current employer for atleast 6 months to transfer my PD?
3. What will happen if i change employer within 6 months, can i still be able to get my PD?
4. Will employers provide approval of I-140 ?
Appreciate for your time,
Thanks
I need some advice on my current situation.I am in the 4th year of my H1-B .I have my
I-140 approved from my current employer with PD of Aug'09.
I am planning to change my job, my concern is :
Assuming that my current employer do not revoke/recall my I-140
1. Do i need to have the same job responsibilities in my new job to transfer my PD?
2. Do i have to stick with my current employer for atleast 6 months to transfer my PD?
3. What will happen if i change employer within 6 months, can i still be able to get my PD?
4. Will employers provide approval of I-140 ?
Appreciate for your time,
Thanks
dresses sayings about haters. love
glus
01-02 12:15 PM
Message to admins:
My attorney has expressed she wanted to help us out. She asked me how she could help our efforts. The attorney is extremely good person and professional. She is not money-driven attorney as many others. Please contact me via private email so we could arrange something. I am sure she could do something for us.
Regards,
My attorney has expressed she wanted to help us out. She asked me how she could help our efforts. The attorney is extremely good person and professional. She is not money-driven attorney as many others. Please contact me via private email so we could arrange something. I am sure she could do something for us.
Regards,
more...
makeup and sayings for haters.
StillonH1B
08-26 08:32 PM
Hi,
Me and my wife went to India and I came back one week back with my ex employer visa without any problem,I had to show only the I-797 for the current company where I am working. My wife she is still in India coming back to US in September.
I am sending my I-797 original to her in the mail.
My concern is will the immigration officer ask her for my I-797 approval or her I-797 approval ( she is on H4). We don't have an I-797 approval for her as my H1 was applied before we got married.My current H1 is expiring on Jan 19th 2009 so we applied for extension for both of us and got the approvals but its only valid from Jan 19th 2009.
Any replies greatly appreciated.
thanks
Me and my wife went to India and I came back one week back with my ex employer visa without any problem,I had to show only the I-797 for the current company where I am working. My wife she is still in India coming back to US in September.
I am sending my I-797 original to her in the mail.
My concern is will the immigration officer ask her for my I-797 approval or her I-797 approval ( she is on H4). We don't have an I-797 approval for her as my H1 was applied before we got married.My current H1 is expiring on Jan 19th 2009 so we applied for extension for both of us and got the approvals but its only valid from Jan 19th 2009.
Any replies greatly appreciated.
thanks
girlfriend 2010 quotes quotes haters, quotes and sayings about haters. lil wayne quotes
d_ankoor
01-20 01:11 AM
My future employer "A" has filed an appeal I290B for denied I140 ("Inability to pay") which is pending at USCIS, however now my current employer "B" wants to file I140 for me. Both of this are on different labor approvals and different job descriptions. Can my current employer "B" file I140 without my future employer "A" withdrawing the I290B appeal? Will filing of I140 by my current employer "B" affect the denial of any of these applications?
Many Thanks,
AnkoorD
Many Thanks,
AnkoorD
hairstyles hot hater quotes and sayings
Macaca
05-25 08:10 PM
Making History, Reluctantly (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/24/AR2007052402069.html) In a Hill Anomaly, Pelosi Shepherds Iraq Bill She Opposes, By Jonathan Weisman (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/jonathan+weisman/) Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, May 25, 2007
In public, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had done nothing to suppress her frustration as she assented to funding the Iraq war without a deadline to end it. But behind closed doors Wednesday night, she was all business.
With its members gathered in her office, she told the House's "Progressive Caucus" that she would vote against the war funding bill, but that she also had no choice but to facilitate its passage. Funds were running out for the troops, and she had promised to protect them. The Memorial Day break loomed, and without the money President Bush would have a week to hammer her party for taking a vacation while the Pentagon scrambled to keep its soldiers fed.
Was she agonized over the situation? Sure, said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), who attended the meeting. But "we all feel that way," he added. "I feel that way, too. Are we going to just walk away now, or are we going to continue this process, to keep the pressure on?"
Yesterday's vote to fund the war through September was a historical rarity: the passage of a bill opposed by the speaker of the House and a majority of the speaker's party.
Two years ago to the day, then-Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) violated the "Hastert rule" -- that only bills supported by a majority of the majority can come up -- by bringing up legislation to allow federal funding for stem cell research. The majority of the Republican majority opposed the law. He voted against it, but he knew it would never become law over President Bush's signature.
Over his objections and the opposition of most Republicans, Hastert did allow passage of campaign finance reform in 2002, but only because a petition drive was about to force the bill to the floor. The North American Free Trade Agreement passed in 1993, over the objections of most Democrats, who were then in the majority. But NAFTA did have the support of then-Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-Wash.), as well as the Democratic president, Bill Clinton.
In contrast, the Iraq funding bill was not only opposed by the majority of House Democrats, it was also ardently opposed by the speaker and even the lawmaker who drafted it, Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.). And it is destined to become law.
"We don't relish bringing a package to the floor that we're not going to vote for," Obey conceded before last night's vote.
Pelosi's agonized decision put her in the company of Foley, who in 1991 brought to the floor the resolution authorizing the Persian Gulf War and then voted against it, and Thomas Brackett Reed, a speaker in the 1890s who voted against the annexation of Hawaii, and then against the Spanish-American War, but allowed both to go forward.
"To have the chairman and the speaker vote against a bill like this, I've never heard of it," Hastert said.
But while protesters outside the Capitol condemned what they saw as a capitulation, Democrats inside were remarkably understanding of their speaker's contortions.
Party leaders jury-rigged the votes yesterday to give all Democrats something to brag about. A parliamentary vote to bring the Iraq funding legislation to the floor included language demanding a showdown vote in September over further funding. A second vote allowed Democrats to vote in favor of funds for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, agricultural drought relief and children's health insurance. Finally, the House got around to funding the war.
Republicans cried foul over what they saw as an abuse of the legislative system, but Democrats saw brilliance in the legerdemain. And with such contortions came more appreciation for the efforts Pelosi was making to fund the war in a fashion most palatable to angry Democrats.
"It was the responsible thing to do, and she's a responsible speaker," said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), who is personally close to Pelosi. "You can't just walk away."
In public, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had done nothing to suppress her frustration as she assented to funding the Iraq war without a deadline to end it. But behind closed doors Wednesday night, she was all business.
With its members gathered in her office, she told the House's "Progressive Caucus" that she would vote against the war funding bill, but that she also had no choice but to facilitate its passage. Funds were running out for the troops, and she had promised to protect them. The Memorial Day break loomed, and without the money President Bush would have a week to hammer her party for taking a vacation while the Pentagon scrambled to keep its soldiers fed.
Was she agonized over the situation? Sure, said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), who attended the meeting. But "we all feel that way," he added. "I feel that way, too. Are we going to just walk away now, or are we going to continue this process, to keep the pressure on?"
Yesterday's vote to fund the war through September was a historical rarity: the passage of a bill opposed by the speaker of the House and a majority of the speaker's party.
Two years ago to the day, then-Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) violated the "Hastert rule" -- that only bills supported by a majority of the majority can come up -- by bringing up legislation to allow federal funding for stem cell research. The majority of the Republican majority opposed the law. He voted against it, but he knew it would never become law over President Bush's signature.
Over his objections and the opposition of most Republicans, Hastert did allow passage of campaign finance reform in 2002, but only because a petition drive was about to force the bill to the floor. The North American Free Trade Agreement passed in 1993, over the objections of most Democrats, who were then in the majority. But NAFTA did have the support of then-Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-Wash.), as well as the Democratic president, Bill Clinton.
In contrast, the Iraq funding bill was not only opposed by the majority of House Democrats, it was also ardently opposed by the speaker and even the lawmaker who drafted it, Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.). And it is destined to become law.
"We don't relish bringing a package to the floor that we're not going to vote for," Obey conceded before last night's vote.
Pelosi's agonized decision put her in the company of Foley, who in 1991 brought to the floor the resolution authorizing the Persian Gulf War and then voted against it, and Thomas Brackett Reed, a speaker in the 1890s who voted against the annexation of Hawaii, and then against the Spanish-American War, but allowed both to go forward.
"To have the chairman and the speaker vote against a bill like this, I've never heard of it," Hastert said.
But while protesters outside the Capitol condemned what they saw as a capitulation, Democrats inside were remarkably understanding of their speaker's contortions.
Party leaders jury-rigged the votes yesterday to give all Democrats something to brag about. A parliamentary vote to bring the Iraq funding legislation to the floor included language demanding a showdown vote in September over further funding. A second vote allowed Democrats to vote in favor of funds for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, agricultural drought relief and children's health insurance. Finally, the House got around to funding the war.
Republicans cried foul over what they saw as an abuse of the legislative system, but Democrats saw brilliance in the legerdemain. And with such contortions came more appreciation for the efforts Pelosi was making to fund the war in a fashion most palatable to angry Democrats.
"It was the responsible thing to do, and she's a responsible speaker," said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), who is personally close to Pelosi. "You can't just walk away."
zephyrus
12-01 05:19 PM
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2006/12/reports_rep_rey.html
Any thoughts/analysis on what this means to our situation?
-zeph
Any thoughts/analysis on what this means to our situation?
-zeph
pttuanzhang
06-02 07:49 PM
You're right, I really admire
No comments:
Post a Comment